Instrument:

Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire (S-NoMAD)—Swedish version

Implementation
outcome:

Sustainability 

Instrument summary:

23-item questionnaire, based on normalisation process theory (NPT), measuring the normalisation of complex healthcare interventions

Level of analysis:

Provider

Country of application:

Sweden

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

7 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Fair

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Good

23 items

Reference:

Elf M, Nordmark S, Lyhagen J, Lindberg I, Finch T, Åberg AC. 

The Swedish version of the Normalization Process Theory Measure S-NoMAD: translation, adaptation, and pilot testing. 

Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):146.

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

7 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

0 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

1 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

1 / 1 Content validity

1 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

0 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

4 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Fair

Reliability

Not assessed

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Fair

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Not assessed

Structural validity

Fair

Hypotheses testing

Not assessed

Cross-cultural validity

Poor

Criterion validity

Not assessed

Global validity score

Poor

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed