Instrument:

A measurement instrument for sustainability of work practices in long-term care—short version

Implementation
outcome:

Sustainability 

Instrument summary:

30-item instrument measuring the sustainability of changed work practices after implementation in long-term care (short version)

Level of analysis:

Organisation

Country of application:

USA

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

7 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Good

30 items

Reference:

Slaghuis SS, Strating MM, Bal RA, Nieboer AP. 

A framework and a measurement instrument for sustainability of work practices in long-term care.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):314.

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

7 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

0 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

1 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

1 / 1 Content validity

0 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

1 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

4 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Poor

Reliability

Not assessed

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Poor

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Poor

Structural validity

Poor

Hypotheses testing

Not assessed

Cross-cultural validity

Not assessed

Criterion validity

Not assessed

Global validity score

Poor

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed