Instrument:

A measure of clinical information technology sophistication in hospitals

Implementation
outcome:

Penetration

Instrument summary:

68-item survey measuring clinical IT sophistication, including internal and external integration of various systems/applications

Level of analysis:

Organisation

Country of application:

USA and Canada

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

3 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Adequate

68 items

Reference:

Jaana M, Ward MM, Paré G, Wakefield DS.

Clinical information technology in hospitals: a comparison between the state of Iowa and two provinces in Canada.

Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(9):719–31.

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

3 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

1 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

1 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

0 / 1 Content validity

0 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

1 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

0 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Poor

Reliability

Not assessed

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Poor

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Not assessed

Structural validity

Not assessed

Hypotheses testing

Not assessed

Cross-cultural validity

Not assessed

Criterion validity

Not assessed

Global validity score

Not assessed

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed