Instrument:

Instrument to test the Clinical Information Systems Success Model (CISSM)

Implementation
outcome:

Feasibility

Instrument summary:

23-item instrument measuring nurses' perceptions about system performance (including ease of use, accessibility, and reliability), information quality, social influence and faciliating conditions predicting successful integration of clinical information systems

Level of analysis:

Provider

Country of application:

USA

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

2 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Excellent

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Good

23 items

Reference:

Garcia-Smith D, Effken JA.

Development and initial evaluation of the Clinical Information Systems Success Model (CISSM) 

Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(6):539–552.

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

2 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

0 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

1 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

0 / 1 Content validity

0 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

0 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

1 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

0 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Excellent

Reliability

Not assessed

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Excellent

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Poor

Structural validity

Excellent

Hypotheses testing

Good

Cross-cultural validity

Not assessed

Criterion validity

Not assessed

Global validity score

Poor

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed