Instrument:

Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

Implementation
outcome:

Appropriateness

Instrument summary:

4-item measure assessing intervention appropriateness

Level of analysis:

Provider

Country of application:

USA

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

8 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Excellent

4 items

Reference:

Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H.

Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures.

Implement Sci. 2017;12:108.

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

8 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

0 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

2 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

1 / 1 Content validity

1 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

1 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

3 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Poor

Reliability

Poor

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Poor

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Good

Structural validity

Poor

Hypotheses testing

Not assessed

Cross-cultural validity

Not assessed

Criterion validity

Not assessed

Global validity score

Poor

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed