Instrument:

Lean in Healthcare Questionnaire (LiHcQ)

Implementation
outcome:

Adoption

Instrument summary:

16-item instrument measuring staff’s perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare

Level of analysis:

Provider

Country of application:

Sweden

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

7 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Excellent

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Fair

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Good

16 items

Reference:

Kaltenbrunner M, Bengtsson L, Mathiassen SE, Engström M

A questionnaire measuring staff perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare: development and psychometric testing.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:1–11.

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

7 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

0 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

0 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

1 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

0 / 1 Content validity

1 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

1 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

4 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Excellent

Reliability

Unable to score*

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Excellent

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Fair

Structural validity

Fair

Hypotheses testing

Not assessed

Cross-cultural validity

Fair

Criterion validity

Not assessed

Global validity score

Fair

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed

*Test-retest reliability procedure not reported therefore unable to score.