Instrument:

Questionnaire of three scoring items for current treatment satisfaction and factors of both clinical trial participation motivations and technology acceptance model

Implementation
outcome:

Acceptability

Instrument summary:

34-item questionnaire, based on the technology acceptance model (TAM), measuring acceptance of future Artificial Pancreas (AP) technology among people with diabetes

Level of analysis:

Consumer

Country of application:

USA

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

0 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Good

34 items

Reference:

Bevier WC, Fuller SM, Fuller RP, Rubin RR, Dassau E, Doyle FJ 3rd, Jovanovič L, Zisser HC.

Artificial pancreas (AP) clinical trial participants’ acceptance of future AP technology.

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(9):590–5

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

0 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

0 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

0 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

0 / 1 Content validity

0 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

0 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

0 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Poor

Reliability

Not assessed

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Poor

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Not assessed

Structural validity

Not assessed

Hypotheses testing

Not assessed

Cross-cultural validity

Not assessed

Criterion validity

Not assessed

Global validity score

Not assessed

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed