Instrument:

Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI)

Implementation
outcome:

Acceptability

Instrument summary:

12-item instrument measuring the acceptability of clinical decision rules among emergency physician

Level of analysis:

Provider

Country of application:

Australasia, Canada, UK and USA

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

3 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Excellent

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Good

12 items

Reference:

Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Wood TJ, Taljaard M, Eagles D, Lott A, Clement C, Kelly A, Mason S, Stiell IG

Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries.

Med Decis Making. 2010;30(3):398-408.

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

3 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

1 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

0 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

1 / 1 Content validity

0 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

1 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

0 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Excellent

Reliability

Not assessed

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Excellent

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Excellent

Structural validity

Excellent

Hypotheses testing

Poor

Cross-cultural validity

Not assessed

Criterion validity

Not assessed

Global validity score

Poor

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed