Instrument:

Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ-J)—Japanese version

Implementation
outcome:

Acceptability

Instrument summary:

18-item questionnaire measuring attitudes and behaviour toward evidence-based practice among nurses

Level of analysis:

Provider

Country of application:

Japan

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

4 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Good

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Fair

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Not assessed

Usability score:

Good

18 items

Reference:

Tomotaki A, Fukahori H, Sakai I, Kurokohchi K.

The development and validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire: Japanese version.

Int J Nurs Pract. 2018;24(2):e12617

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

4 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

0 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

1 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

1 / 1 Content validity

1 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

1 / 1 Discriminant validity

1 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

1 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

0 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

-2 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Good

Reliability

Good

Measurement error

Not assessed

Global reliability score

Good

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Fair

Structural validity

Fair

Hypotheses testing

Not assessed

Cross-cultural validity

Fair

Criterion validity

Good

Global validity score

Fair

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Not assessed