Instrument:

Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ)

Implementation
outcome:

Acceptability

Instrument summary:

21-item questionnaire measuring expectations and satisfaction of cancer treatment among adult cancer patients

Level of analysis:

Consumer

Country of application:

USA

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

2 / 22

Global reliability
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Global validity
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Responsiveness
score (COSMIN):

Poor

Usability score:

Good

21 items

Reference:

Abetz L, Coombs JH, Keininger DL, Earle CC, Wade C, Bury-Maynard D, Copley-Merriman K, Hsu M.

Development of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire: item generation and content validity testing.

Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2005;8(Suppl 1):S41–53.

Psychometric quality
(ConPsyCL):

ConPsyCL score:

2 / 22

Reliability (Max 5pts)

Internal consistency (Max 3pts)

0 / 1Item internal consistency
/ Item total correlation

0 / 2Alpha

 

Test-retest or inter-rater (Max 2pts)

0 / 1 Item level

0 / 1 Factor level

 

Validity (Max 5pts)

1 / 1 Content validity

1 / 1 Face validity

0 / 1 Convergent validity

0 / 1 Discriminant validity

0 / 1 Discriminative validity

 

Factor Analysis (Max 12pts)

0 / 1 Adequacy measures

0 / 1 Kaiser criterion

0 / 1 Variance explained
/ Parallel analysis

0 / 1 Main loadings

0 / 4 EFA goodness of fit

0 / 4 CFA Goodness of fit

 

0 / -2 Penalty

Methodological quality:
(COSMIN)

Reliability

See how Reliability is scored

Internal consistency

Poor

Reliability

Poor

Measurement error

Poor

Global reliability score

Poor

Validity

See how Validity is scored

Content validity

Fair

Structural validity

Fair

Hypotheses testing

Poor

Cross-cultural validity

Poor

Criterion validity

Poor

Global validity score

Poor

Responsiveness

See how Responsiveness is scored

Responsiveness

Poor